Stereo speakers are naturally easier for a surround sound speaker system. When the plant a lot of money in your home theater money to go further down with only two speakers you can enjoy the budget. This allows the use of much higher quality components.
If the same amount of money is spent, ceteris paribus, the sound quality of stereo speakers to be higher than a multi-channel, select a configuration system.Why stereo speakers, multi-channel home theaterSystem?
Some, like the simplicity of it. Some, like the enveloping sound that is a good 2-channel rig
I love my home theater stereo. I always thought that the money I spent on a sound system better be spent just upgraded my home theater system, stereo, amplifier and subwoofer. I think it's just a matter of opinion, but I still like 2-channel stereo speaker systems, and I have many, many more channels home theater systems, which belongs to the state of the art audio boastedand video.
What is best for you, your stereo or surround sound systems?
I say stereo instead of surround sound home theater?
Well, maybe ... I think it depends on several factors.
• Budget
• WAF (Wife Acceptance Factor)
• Movies and music preferences
• Game?
• The available space in the room - the effects of the room and room size
It 'simply easier to get a really good stereo sound. But this does not meanOne should not pursue full surround.
There are many factors to establish a new layout for the home theater.
Most consumers just slap together a system and say: ". Now I have a home theater system" But unfortunately they are not aware until later that seems really good.
It usually takes time to listen to an audio system deficiencies. But as soon as it is, it is very difficult to ignore. If you decide to comply with full surround you go to the workup of thisBudget for the system.
If you were to spend $ 1000 on 2 channels, you need to get $ 2500 in 5-spend the same surround sound quality. Most consumers do not think so.
Peter
0 comments:
Post a Comment